VetClick
Menu Menu
Login

VetClick

/ News
Thursday, 28th March 2024 | 4,184 veterinary jobs online | 102 people actively seeking work | 5,479 practices registered

Veterinary Industry News

Send us your news

Plans To License Wild Animal Circuses In The Hands Of The Lords

11 years ago
1520 views

Posted
23rd October, 2012 11h00


On Wednesday, 24 October, the draft regulations for the licensing of wild animals in circuses will be discussed at a Grand Committee in the House of Lords. The debate will provide peers with the opportunity to review the proposed legislation and decide whether it is robust enough to serve its purpose. Animal Defenders International (ADI) believes that the regulations are unworkable, ineffective and will not safeguard the welfare of wild animals in circuses. For example, licensing would not have prevented:To support the draft legislation on licensing, the government has produced guidance for circus operators but this document is flawed with gaping holes in key welfare considerations. For example the document does not cover some species which are currently touring with circuses; of five species categories, only one has guidelines concerning the display, training and performance of animals; and there is no restriction on breeding, which could mean that the number of animals in circuses actually increases. Despite promises since 2006 that a wild animal circus ban will be introduced – most recently in March of this year – and political and public support for a ban, it is hugely disappointing that the government are continuing to waste taxpayers’ money and parliamentary time by pressing ahead with plans to regulate. Jan Creamer, ADI Chief Executive says: “The UK prides itself on being a world leader in animal welfare but Europe and South America are leading the way on this issue, with animal circus bans in Ecuador, Greece and Peru announced this year alone. When is the UK government going to stay true to its promise and consign the use of wild animals in circuses into the past where it belongs?”

More from


You might be interested in...